Dating Sites Reviews Forums
Bangmatch
Page navigation
- 1
- 2
populuxe
Anonymous
Although, I feel more comfortable with mainstream sites like Match, I experimented with this "adult" site over the weekend with a three day four buck trial.
My approach: I contacted about two dozen local women within fifteen years of my age (49). Most of the women's profiles were very brief, usually with one or two sentence suggestive lines, despite the fact that the site has a fairly intensive questionarie that subscribers can use. There weren't a lot of photos, but I don't know that I would expect that from women in this setting. I am not comfortable with posting photos of myself on a site of this nature, but filled out the "sexual profile" throughly, and wrote up what I felt was a decent seductive script. I also offered to exchange photos, and in a few instances where more effort was put into the prospect's profile, I just sent some.
Once I posted my profile and sent messages out, the site immediately threw in a rather mediocre porn site for free. A day into it, I recieved an unsolicited response back from a woman named Paula, 26 yo, from a thousand miles away. Paula even had a nude photo, and suggested she "liked" my profile, and "travelled". Now I feel I'm a catch, but I'm wise enough and experienced enough with dating sites to know that 26 yos from miles away will not contact me, so obviously bogus.
After the three days had passed, I had not recieved a single response back. If I had sent (with profile and my photos) the same number of contacts (24) to reasonably selected profiles of women on Match, my response rate would have been maybe a third (8). Of the eight, I could have met in person four of those. If my goal was to get laid (I'm above average looks, fit, fun and healthy, but also older), I'd guess after the standard mainstream couple dates, I would have had two of those women. Of course most women on Match are looking for at minimum good dating relationships, so although I have done it, basically I consider it unethical to just be out there going through women sexually on that kind of site, unless your intentions are straightforward. Obviously, Bangmatch would be a different story.
If I had to guess, I would say many of the profiles on Bangmatch are real women, although the effort put in suggests they are mostly fishing expeditions, much more so than a mainstream site like Match. One problem may be that the site operators simply can't deliver the volume of mail, especially from males? At any rate, for me to pay $33 a month for any site, I expect my messages to be delivered promptly, and returned in kind, not happening here.
Resigning was an easy process. I will post again, if it turns into a billing hassle.
My approach: I contacted about two dozen local women within fifteen years of my age (49). Most of the women's profiles were very brief, usually with one or two sentence suggestive lines, despite the fact that the site has a fairly intensive questionarie that subscribers can use. There weren't a lot of photos, but I don't know that I would expect that from women in this setting. I am not comfortable with posting photos of myself on a site of this nature, but filled out the "sexual profile" throughly, and wrote up what I felt was a decent seductive script. I also offered to exchange photos, and in a few instances where more effort was put into the prospect's profile, I just sent some.
Once I posted my profile and sent messages out, the site immediately threw in a rather mediocre porn site for free. A day into it, I recieved an unsolicited response back from a woman named Paula, 26 yo, from a thousand miles away. Paula even had a nude photo, and suggested she "liked" my profile, and "travelled". Now I feel I'm a catch, but I'm wise enough and experienced enough with dating sites to know that 26 yos from miles away will not contact me, so obviously bogus.
After the three days had passed, I had not recieved a single response back. If I had sent (with profile and my photos) the same number of contacts (24) to reasonably selected profiles of women on Match, my response rate would have been maybe a third (8). Of the eight, I could have met in person four of those. If my goal was to get laid (I'm above average looks, fit, fun and healthy, but also older), I'd guess after the standard mainstream couple dates, I would have had two of those women. Of course most women on Match are looking for at minimum good dating relationships, so although I have done it, basically I consider it unethical to just be out there going through women sexually on that kind of site, unless your intentions are straightforward. Obviously, Bangmatch would be a different story.
If I had to guess, I would say many of the profiles on Bangmatch are real women, although the effort put in suggests they are mostly fishing expeditions, much more so than a mainstream site like Match. One problem may be that the site operators simply can't deliver the volume of mail, especially from males? At any rate, for me to pay $33 a month for any site, I expect my messages to be delivered promptly, and returned in kind, not happening here.
Resigning was an easy process. I will post again, if it turns into a billing hassle.
4
4
Quote
Almost Tried it!
Anonymous
Thanks for the review. I was thinking of trying bangmatch but maybe I'll stick to the more mainstream sites (especially for 33 bucks a month).
4
4
Quote
Great site
Anonymous
The women of bangmatch are great, it is a great site and I highly recommend it. I have had several sexual encounters..it was amazing.
4
5
Quote
AJF
Anonymous

This site is a complete rip-off. Minimum payment to send messages £15 that gives you 10 messages(£1.50 each) All the women that contact you are very eager to meet you for sex until, you try & make a date, then it'll take about 10 messages just to get their first name, they keep fobbing you off with excuses like, I don't know you that well, lets just slow down etc. STAY AWAY FROM THIS SITE, for the good of your wallet.
4
3
Quote
Another punter
Anonymous

Agree entirely with the previous comments. Site is a complete rip off. Quick responses but no substance and questions never answered. Always the underlying bit is "slow down and lets get to know each other". If there is no substance and it is £1.50 a text what else would it be other than a scam.
4
4
Quote
mucky2022
Anonymous

site is most definatly a scam no one ever wants to meet after 10 messages at 1.50 you just get fobbed off
3
3
Quote
Jim
Anonymous

Yes I agree that the site is a scam. I think that there is something like a call centre where your messages are answered 24 hours a day. I have spent about £600 and chatted to many women. But they are so evasive. I would steer clear of this site. I am trying to get a friend to hack it because it needs to be exposed for what it is.
4
3
Quote
Anon
Anonymous
"In addition you are aware that we use moderated and fictive profiles for online adult entertainment purposes. Physical contact with these fictive profiles is not possible." Quote from terms and conditions. Site is bs
5
3
Quote
Anonymous 13
Anonymous
I would strongly advise ant one to hang onto their money. It is very expensive. Many of the women have been on the site for some time. You will usually get a quick response but as others have indicated when it comes to setting up a meeting they are well practiced in the rebuff...too busy...too early..or I will get back to you (they never do!)...
5
4
Quote
Hulldon1
Anonymous
Sister sites with the same profiles, billing etc. NSA Sex Contacts, Real Sex Contacts, Mature Sex Contacts. Advise from the psychologists and dating experts. If a woman will not meet after two weeks she never will. On these sites that could still cost £1000 of chatting. Be realistic. Talk only to local women. Ask them to verify local details. Difficult as there is a wealth of information about everything on the net. Ask for something that can be verified, nearby company. Everyone knows of a big company nearby that shut down. Don't be a dick. Who would want to meet you? ask yourself that. Finally if you are that desperate......hire an escort or use a prostitute. It will be a lot cheaper and safer, they regularly get check ups for disease. Happy hunting.
8
4
Quote
Page navigation
- 1
- 2
All times are EDT. The time is now 05:48 pm.
- Normal Topic
- Sticky Topic
- Locked Topic
- New Post
- Sticky Topic W/ New Post
- Locked Topic W/ New Post
- View Anonymous Posts
- Able to post
- HTML Allowed
- Censored Content