Forum Subject: Bangmatch
Posted on: 2005/06/27 12:47pm
By: Anonymous (populuxe)
Although, I feel more comfortable with mainstream sites like Match, I experimented with this "adult" site over the weekend with a three day four buck trial.
My approach: I contacted about two dozen local women within fifteen years of my age (49). Most of the women's profiles were very brief, usually with one or two sentence suggestive lines, despite the fact that the site has a fairly intensive questionarie that subscribers can use. There weren't a lot of photos, but I don't know that I would expect that from women in this setting. I am not comfortable with posting photos of myself on a site of this nature, but filled out the "sexual profile" throughly, and wrote up what I felt was a decent seductive script. I also offered to exchange photos, and in a few instances where more effort was put into the prospect's profile, I just sent some.
Once I posted my profile and sent messages out, the site immediately threw in a rather mediocre porn site for free. A day into it, I recieved an unsolicited response back from a woman named Paula, 26 yo, from a thousand miles away. Paula even had a nude photo, and suggested she "liked" my profile, and "travelled". Now I feel I'm a catch, but I'm wise enough and experienced enough with dating sites to know that 26 yos from miles away will not contact me, so obviously bogus.
After the three days had passed, I had not recieved a single response back. If I had sent (with profile and my photos) the same number of contacts (24) to reasonably selected profiles of women on Match, my response rate would have been maybe a third (8). Of the eight, I could have met in person four of those. If my goal was to get laid (I'm above average looks, fit, fun and healthy, but also older), I'd guess after the standard mainstream couple dates, I would have had two of those women. Of course most women on Match are looking for at minimum good dating relationships, so although I have done it, basically I consider it unethical to just be out there going through women sexually on that kind of site, unless your intentions are straightforward. Obviously, Bangmatch would be a different story.
If I had to guess, I would say many of the profiles on Bangmatch are real women, although the effort put in suggests they are mostly fishing expeditions, much more so than a mainstream site like Match. One problem may be that the site operators simply can't deliver the volume of mail, especially from males? At any rate, for me to pay $33 a month for any site, I expect my messages to be delivered promptly, and returned in kind, not happening here.
Resigning was an easy process. I will post again, if it turns into a billing hassle.
My approach: I contacted about two dozen local women within fifteen years of my age (49). Most of the women's profiles were very brief, usually with one or two sentence suggestive lines, despite the fact that the site has a fairly intensive questionarie that subscribers can use. There weren't a lot of photos, but I don't know that I would expect that from women in this setting. I am not comfortable with posting photos of myself on a site of this nature, but filled out the "sexual profile" throughly, and wrote up what I felt was a decent seductive script. I also offered to exchange photos, and in a few instances where more effort was put into the prospect's profile, I just sent some.
Once I posted my profile and sent messages out, the site immediately threw in a rather mediocre porn site for free. A day into it, I recieved an unsolicited response back from a woman named Paula, 26 yo, from a thousand miles away. Paula even had a nude photo, and suggested she "liked" my profile, and "travelled". Now I feel I'm a catch, but I'm wise enough and experienced enough with dating sites to know that 26 yos from miles away will not contact me, so obviously bogus.
After the three days had passed, I had not recieved a single response back. If I had sent (with profile and my photos) the same number of contacts (24) to reasonably selected profiles of women on Match, my response rate would have been maybe a third (8). Of the eight, I could have met in person four of those. If my goal was to get laid (I'm above average looks, fit, fun and healthy, but also older), I'd guess after the standard mainstream couple dates, I would have had two of those women. Of course most women on Match are looking for at minimum good dating relationships, so although I have done it, basically I consider it unethical to just be out there going through women sexually on that kind of site, unless your intentions are straightforward. Obviously, Bangmatch would be a different story.
If I had to guess, I would say many of the profiles on Bangmatch are real women, although the effort put in suggests they are mostly fishing expeditions, much more so than a mainstream site like Match. One problem may be that the site operators simply can't deliver the volume of mail, especially from males? At any rate, for me to pay $33 a month for any site, I expect my messages to be delivered promptly, and returned in kind, not happening here.
Resigning was an easy process. I will post again, if it turns into a billing hassle.
Bangmatch
Posted on: 2005/06/27 06:44pm
By: Anonymous (Almost Tried it!)
Thanks for the review. I was thinking of trying bangmatch but maybe I'll stick to the more mainstream sites (especially for 33 bucks a month).
Re: Bangmatch
Posted on: 2007/03/24 04:38am
By: Anonymous (Great site)
The women of bangmatch are great, it is a great site and I highly recommend it. I have had several sexual encounters..it was amazing.
Re: Bangmatch
Posted on: 2014/12/20 09:10pm
By: Anonymous (AJF)
This site is a complete rip-off. Minimum payment to send messages £15 that gives you 10 messages(£1.50 each) All the women that contact you are very eager to meet you for sex until, you try & make a date, then it'll take about 10 messages just to get their first name, they keep fobbing you off with excuses like, I don't know you that well, lets just slow down etc. STAY AWAY FROM THIS SITE, for the good of your wallet.
Re: Bangmatch
Posted on: 2015/04/23 08:15am
By: Anonymous (Another punter)
Agree entirely with the previous comments. Site is a complete rip off. Quick responses but no substance and questions never answered. Always the underlying bit is "slow down and lets get to know each other". If there is no substance and it is £1.50 a text what else would it be other than a scam.
Re: Bangmatch
Posted on: 2015/07/15 06:41am
By: Anonymous (mucky2022)
site is most definatly a scam no one ever wants to meet after 10 messages at 1.50 you just get fobbed off
Re: Bangmatch
Posted on: 2015/08/20 11:22pm
By: Anonymous (Jim)
Yes I agree that the site is a scam. I think that there is something like a call centre where your messages are answered 24 hours a day. I have spent about £600 and chatted to many women. But they are so evasive. I would steer clear of this site. I am trying to get a friend to hack it because it needs to be exposed for what it is.
Re: Bangmatch
Posted on: 2015/09/09 12:05pm
By: Anonymous (Anon)
"In addition you are aware that we use moderated and fictive profiles for online adult entertainment purposes. Physical contact with these fictive profiles is not possible." Quote from terms and conditions. Site is bs
Re: Bangmatch
Posted on: 2015/09/22 11:31am
By: Anonymous (Anonymous 13)
I would strongly advise ant one to hang onto their money. It is very expensive. Many of the women have been on the site for some time. You will usually get a quick response but as others have indicated when it comes to setting up a meeting they are well practiced in the rebuff...too busy...too early..or I will get back to you (they never do!)...
Re: Bangmatch
Posted on: 2015/11/08 03:11am
By: Anonymous (Hulldon1)
Sister sites with the same profiles, billing etc. NSA Sex Contacts, Real Sex Contacts, Mature Sex Contacts. Advise from the psychologists and dating experts. If a woman will not meet after two weeks she never will. On these sites that could still cost £1000 of chatting. Be realistic. Talk only to local women. Ask them to verify local details. Difficult as there is a wealth of information about everything on the net. Ask for something that can be verified, nearby company. Everyone knows of a big company nearby that shut down. Don't be a dick. Who would want to meet you? ask yourself that. Finally if you are that desperate......hire an escort or use a prostitute. It will be a lot cheaper and safer, they regularly get check ups for disease. Happy hunting.
Re: Bangmatch
Posted on: 2015/11/11 03:31pm
By: Anonymous (Detective)
Talking to a girl on Bangmatch who is on another Sex Dating site. I have improved my photos with a male model. I'll let you know if she takes the bate lol. Let's find out how genuine they are. Call back to find out. 
Re: Bangmatch
Posted on: 2015/11/22 01:16pm
By: Anonymous (Detective)
Update: these women love the male model on my profile. End of week two the woman I spoke to from Real Sex Contacts took the bait and chatted merrily. I told her I had to leave after two weeks she would not meet. At the end of two weeks I told her I knew her from Real Sex Contacts and she had changed all but her pictures profile name and age. Surprisingly she deny's all knowledge of Real Sex Contacts. I have now asked her to prove her identity by meeting a guy off the Bangmatch and being photographed naked with him then sending me the picture. That way I can verify him and her. We'll wait and see. Cost so far for 2 weeks chat.....£500.
Re: Bangmatch
Posted on: 2015/11/30 11:15am
By: Anonymous (giawol)
this website only for chat, not for real sex or dating. most of profiles of women like spread with gel if you understand what I mean, but this only deception. to decide men at chat. only men pay for girls chat with men free. For women it is good dirty chat, and men pay for this lol
Re: Bangmatch Results
Posted on: 2016/01/07 04:25am
By: Anonymous (Detective)
If you have read my previous feed back here is the final result. I now have been speaking to XPoseUK for 2 years, regularly. I will not divulge the £1000's spent. If you remember she was and is on Real Sex Contacts before appearing on Bangmatch as well. (As did most profiles from Real Sex Contacts) This raised questions so I pursued XPoseUK. Her residence changed, her job changed, her marital status changed, her offspring changed when she appeared on BangMatch. I am not saying that this woman is not real but it is highly likely she is a sex worker, working for 1-2-1 communications (the owner of BangMatch). There is a possibility that she was paying for Real Sex Contacts so moved to BangMatch which would be free for her but at the end of the day this persona had no intentions of meeting. Remember the the old telephone chat lines....welcome to today's interpretation by the internet. Anybody who states they have met girls off the site ask them for their site name and that of the person they have met then what them squirm because they cannot give. Ultimately there is no way to prove that anything about the people interactions are genuine.
Finally here is a thought. Let's say I am a woman looking for sex. Which must be discreet. Why would I plaster my face and naked body on the internet so everybody can see. Does that make sense to you?
Advise, this type of site is a modern sex chat site. If the girls will not communicate by email, phone, Skype etc then they are not genuine. I have used many other mainstream sites where the girls are wanting to communicate by email or meet within a couple of weeks.
Finally if XPoseUK is real, I would like to thank her for helping me through a difficult life change of divorce. It is a pity for me we couldn't prove how well we got on it real life.
Finally here is a thought. Let's say I am a woman looking for sex. Which must be discreet. Why would I plaster my face and naked body on the internet so everybody can see. Does that make sense to you?
Advise, this type of site is a modern sex chat site. If the girls will not communicate by email, phone, Skype etc then they are not genuine. I have used many other mainstream sites where the girls are wanting to communicate by email or meet within a couple of weeks.
Finally if XPoseUK is real, I would like to thank her for helping me through a difficult life change of divorce. It is a pity for me we couldn't prove how well we got on it real life.
Re: Bangmatch
Posted on: 2016/05/27 12:17pm
By: Anonymous (John)
Stay away, texts at £1.50 each is a rip off and non of the women want to meet up even during day at mutually agreeable safe location.
Re: Bangmatch
Posted on: 2016/11/03 01:38pm
By: Anonymous (Christopher)
Yes this site is a ripoff, the 'women' never want to meet you and always find a way to keep you talking (and therefore spending) each text costs a pound after sixty messages I realized that these 'women' are probably not even people, just a call center somewhere and the 'system' does not allow you to exchange information, STAY AWAY